Skip to main content
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

User Access


Metalforming -  Ad - April 2022
Directory pinned ad
Leap -  Ad - Empowering Contractors
RClub pinned ad
Information pinned ad
RLW pinned ad
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

Insurance And OSHA Question

« Back To Roofers Talk
Author
Posts
April 13, 2009 at 9:22 a.m.

Mike H

HOP,

It is an "additional" duty, insomuch as you do not need a monitor unless someone is outside the flagged perimeter, or if a roof is less than 50' wide, there are no flags then a monitor is a full-time requirement. If the monitor is needed, monitoring is to be his ONLY DUTY.

On a steep slope, defined as anything over 4/12, my guys are 100% fall arrest, so a monitor is not an issue, and I don't know what the requirements may be with lesser arrangements.>>>

April 13, 2009 at 6:10 p.m.

Rozziroofer

Ed, i think you need to re-check the osha rules.

Jed (with chit still on ur face) For all my key points its ROZZI not Mac. I would like for my credits to go to me not whoever u r referring to as Mac.>>>

April 13, 2009 at 8:22 p.m.

Ed The Roofer

Rozziroofer Said: Ed, i think you need to re-check the osha rules.

Jed (with chit still on ur face) For all my key points its ROZZI not Mac. I would like for my credits to go to me not whoever u r referring to as Mac.

Do you have something to point out?

Ed>>>

April 14, 2009 at 5:07 p.m.

Rozziroofer

In the situation ur describing u would need one or the other not both unless someone is in fact outside the barriers.>>>

April 14, 2009 at 6:29 p.m.

Ed The Roofer

I said in one of the earlier posts, that it would be an, "Either/Or" option.

Ed>>>

April 14, 2009 at 10:09 p.m.

egg

Regardless of any other considerations & etc., you deserve a little round of applause for using your mind to penetrate these mysteries, Ed. You know this, of course, but nobody else seems to be giving you the nod you deserve, so let me do it here. They play the game that way so why shouldn't we play the whole game, not just the segment they point us in. By the way, thank you for using the word 'regardless' instead of the currently normal 'irregardless.' That also shows attention to detail. For any who wonders what the heck I'm talking about, just start with 'regard.' Everybody knows what regard is. Regardless is its opposite. Putting an 'irr' in front of that turns it back into regard. Like 'reverent' and 'irreverent.' or 'rational' and 'irrational.' It would be like starting with the word, 'skilled.' Then we go to 'unskilled.' Then we go to 'ununskilled?' What they heck would that exactly mean I wonder? Not necessarily skilled. Twilight zone for the mind. How about this: Mind. Mindless. Irrmindless. But then usually you just get, "you know what I mean." 'Not too shabby," I understand completely. "Irregardless" just scratches the blackboard.>>>

April 14, 2009 at 10:24 p.m.

Mike H

Well if weeze gonna be freekin' word police, I gotsta say egg, it sure wooda sounded better iffin u'da said "unskilledless" instead of ununskilled.

Besides, can you really tell me that irregardless bothers you as much as people that don't know the flippin difference between the words "then" and "than"?

;)>>>

April 14, 2009 at 10:38 p.m.

egg

lol. When Tom does that I always think it sounds kinda cute. Yer rite for that example. It jus dont come so unnaturally for me I kinda get all confused about how to do it right to make it really wrong the bestest.>>>

April 14, 2009 at 10:40 p.m.

Ed The Roofer

Youall did jest qwite a good enuf job ther Mr. Egg.

Ed>>>


« Back To Roofers Talk
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Sheridan Tools - Banner Ad - May 2022
Translate
Default
English
Español
Français

User Access


Information pinned ad
NRCA -  - Roofing week
Forum pinned ad
Metalforming -  Ad - April 2022
RClub pinned ad
Tremco -  Ad - Spring Into Action With a Roof Inspection

Loading…
Loading the web debug toolbar…
Attempt #